I like all sorts of puzzles, but I still consider myself to be a burr guy. As such, I always look forward to Frans de Vreugd’s International Puzzle Party (IPP) exchange puzzle every year. This year’s puzzle, Curly Burr N8, was designed by Frans himself and made by Pelikan using Maple and Merbau. Should have been Curly Burl Maple – just sayin. However, one of my pieces is curly on the end.
The information that comes with the puzzle indicates that it has a unique level 8 solution. This means that it takes 8 moves to remove the first piece from a fully assembled puzzle. Unfortunately (or fortunately), it comes unassembled and there are quite a few required moves before the last piece gets put in. And they forgot to mark the piece the goes in last. Of course, being the expert burr puzzler that I am, I started with that piece as the first piece.
I always enjoy solving 6 piece burrs. I start by taking the pieces and examining them. Each piece is new and has its own specific role to play in the solution dance. This ensemble has a pair of twins, which helps to reduce the complexity a bit. While experimenting with the pieces, you develop a feel for how the notches and nobs are used and given the nature of these particular pieces, how the pieces have to move to start a disassembly process.
I worked on one assembly for a while, but was not able to get to the finish line with it. As difficult as it is to break away from a potentially promising assembly, I reversed some of the pieces to successfully solve the puzzle. Along the way, I discovered that the piece that I started out with needed to be the last piece, and I found it a bit of a dexterity problem to hold all the pieces in place as I juggled the remaining pieces to swap it out and then reintroduced it later. Once it was added, it was just a matter of manipulating the pieces to close it up.
This puzzle does have a red herring. I was continually puzzled by an aspect of one of the pieces. After solving the puzzle, I was left wondering if it had been used without me noticing it. So, I carefully disassembled it while keeping a close eye on this piece and I was left with the impression that it had more capability than was being used. Next, I looked at all the pieces. It was then that I realized that this feature was not there for the solution but for the manufacturing. I approve - well done!
As of this writing, there are still copies available for purchase on Pelikan’s website. If you are a burr person like myself, I highly recommend getting it.
On the path of exercising the mind. Expanding developing minds and preserving more mature ones.
Showing posts with label Frans de Vreugd. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Frans de Vreugd. Show all posts
Wednesday, August 7, 2024
Wednesday, May 15, 2019
Identity I A
Every year, serious puzzle collectors from around the world gather to buy, sell, swap, and discuss puzzles at the International Puzzle Party (IPP). A major part of the IPP is the puzzle exchange, where participants bring copies of a new puzzle design to exchange with up to 100 other participants. At the end of the exchange, each participant then has a new puzzle from each of the other exchangers. You would think that this would be enough puzzles to keep them busy till next year, but for these collectors, it is not even close.
After the puzzle exchange, leftover puzzles are frequently sold at the following puzzle party, which is a large puzzle market featuring a wide variety of the worlds finest puzzle masterpieces from the best craftsmen in the world. I use the term craftsmen loosely since a few of these renowned craftsmen are women.
One of my primary goals every year is to acquire the puzzle exchanged by Frans de Vreugd. The designs by Frans hit my sweet spot in terms of puzzle complexity and enjoyment. When Frans does not provide a puzzle of his own design, he makes sure to provide one of the same caliber.
Frans’ exchange puzzle for last year was Identity I A designed by Andrey Ustjuzhanin. It consists of four identical pieces packed into a U-shaped frame. Although many exchange puzzles may be of a slightly lower quality than a craftsman would make to sell, the Identity I A puzzle is of top notch quality. The frame is made from wenge, one of my favorite types of wood for puzzles. The pieces are equally nice, but I’m embarrassed to admit that I don’t know the exact type of wood used. The puzzle is nicely finished and the frame even uses dowels to reinforce the joints. The color of the pieces and dowels contrast nicely with the dark wenge frame.
The puzzle came assembled and I quickly removed the pieces from the frame and let it sit for a while. I like to provide enough time to forget any of the disassembly process to make the assembly more challenging. After all, it’s only five pieces that have to go into the frame and they are all identical. How hard can it be?
I sat down with the puzzle expecting a short session to get those few identical pieces in the frame and was chagrined that I didn’t allocate enough time to get it assembled. It took another longer session to figure out how all the pieces go back in the frame.
Usually when solving this type of puzzle, I like to determine how the pieces would be combined outside the frame and then determine the order that they need to be inserted into the frame. I found this approach more difficult than usual with this particular puzzle due to the large number of voids in the final assembly and abandoned it in favor of simply working with the pieces within the frame. The frame can hold 40 cubes and the pieces only use 30 or 75% of the space within the cube.
It turns out that there is only one way that the pieces can reside within the cube but the pieces can be added in different orders. The ordering that requires the least number of moves provides a difficulty of 4.3.3.2.2, i.e., 4 moves to take out the first piece, 3 to take out the second, etc.
Packing puzzles where all the pieces are the same are not new but this one is particularly elegant given that it only has 5 pieces and is a non-trivial packing/interlocking puzzle. The fact that it is so nicely made makes it even more special. I’m looking forward to this year’s exchange puzzle.
After the puzzle exchange, leftover puzzles are frequently sold at the following puzzle party, which is a large puzzle market featuring a wide variety of the worlds finest puzzle masterpieces from the best craftsmen in the world. I use the term craftsmen loosely since a few of these renowned craftsmen are women.
One of my primary goals every year is to acquire the puzzle exchanged by Frans de Vreugd. The designs by Frans hit my sweet spot in terms of puzzle complexity and enjoyment. When Frans does not provide a puzzle of his own design, he makes sure to provide one of the same caliber.
Frans’ exchange puzzle for last year was Identity I A designed by Andrey Ustjuzhanin. It consists of four identical pieces packed into a U-shaped frame. Although many exchange puzzles may be of a slightly lower quality than a craftsman would make to sell, the Identity I A puzzle is of top notch quality. The frame is made from wenge, one of my favorite types of wood for puzzles. The pieces are equally nice, but I’m embarrassed to admit that I don’t know the exact type of wood used. The puzzle is nicely finished and the frame even uses dowels to reinforce the joints. The color of the pieces and dowels contrast nicely with the dark wenge frame.
The puzzle came assembled and I quickly removed the pieces from the frame and let it sit for a while. I like to provide enough time to forget any of the disassembly process to make the assembly more challenging. After all, it’s only five pieces that have to go into the frame and they are all identical. How hard can it be?

Usually when solving this type of puzzle, I like to determine how the pieces would be combined outside the frame and then determine the order that they need to be inserted into the frame. I found this approach more difficult than usual with this particular puzzle due to the large number of voids in the final assembly and abandoned it in favor of simply working with the pieces within the frame. The frame can hold 40 cubes and the pieces only use 30 or 75% of the space within the cube.
It turns out that there is only one way that the pieces can reside within the cube but the pieces can be added in different orders. The ordering that requires the least number of moves provides a difficulty of 4.3.3.2.2, i.e., 4 moves to take out the first piece, 3 to take out the second, etc.
Packing puzzles where all the pieces are the same are not new but this one is particularly elegant given that it only has 5 pieces and is a non-trivial packing/interlocking puzzle. The fact that it is so nicely made makes it even more special. I’m looking forward to this year’s exchange puzzle.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)